Oral Microbiome, Mental Health, and Sleep Outcomes During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Observational Study in Chinese and Korean American Immigrants.

COVID-19 is a systemic disease whose effects are not limited to the respiratory system. The oral microbiome (OM)-brain axis is of growing interest in understanding the broader, neuropsychiatric, impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic through a systems biology lens. In this context, mental health and sleep disturbance are often reported by Asian Americans. In a cross-sectional observational study design, we examined the associations of the oral microbiome with mental health among Asian Americans during the COVID-19 pandemic (between November 2020 and April 2021). Participants (n = 20) were adult Chinese and Korean American immigrants in Atlanta, Georgia, and primarily born outside the United States (60%) with a mean age of 34.8 years ±14 (standard deviation). Participants reported depressive symptoms, anxiety, and sleep disturbance, as measured by standard questionnaires. The OM was characterized by 16S rRNA V3-V4 gene using saliva. Depressive symptoms and anxiety were reported by 60% (n = 12) of participants, whereas 35% (n = 7) reported sleep disturbance. The α-diversity was significantly associated with depressive symptoms, and marginally with anxiety. Participants with depressive symptoms and anxiety had enriched Rothia and Scardovia, respectively, whereas those without symptoms had enriched Fusobacterium. Individuals with sleep disturbance had enriched Kingella. In conclusion, this study suggests significant associations of the OM diversity with certain mental health dimensions such as depressive symptoms and anxiety. Specific taxa were associated with these symptoms. The present observations in a modest sample size suggest the possible relevance of the OM-brain axis in studies of mental health during COVID-19.

Adaptation of Metabolomics and Microbiomic Research Protocols During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: When the COVID-19 pandemic hit in 2020, researchers in the P30 Center for the Study of Symptom Science, Metabolomics, and Multiple Chronic Conditions at Emory University's Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing faced major challenges in recruitment and data collection because of limited access to the clinic and community facilities and the risk of COVID-19 exposure associated with in-person study contact. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this article is to (a) describe how a cadre of pilot/supplement principal investigators adapted their studies to allow for safe and trustworthy data collection during the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020 through date of publication) and (b) discuss steps that facilitated the technical aspects of remote data collection, especially involving biological specimens. RESULTS: Four pilot studies and two administrative supplements within the center-all at different stages of execution-adopted various alternative remote recruitment, enrollment, and data and specimen collection approaches to continue their research endeavors in a way that maximized the safety of both the research participants and the research teams. DISCUSSION: The article concludes with a discussion on the importance of a participant-centered approach when using remote methods, actions, or steps initiated to facilitate the technical aspects of remote data collection and reflections on the continued use of remote research strategies beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.

Antibody Profiles According to Mild or Severe SARS-CoV-2 Infection, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 2020.

Among patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19), IgM levels increased early after symptom onset for those with mild and severe disease, but IgG levels increased early only in those with severe disease. A similar pattern was observed in a separate serosurveillance cohort. Mild COVID-19 should be investigated separately from severe COVID-19.